N4D IN PARTNERSHIP WITH GOVERNMENT OF NIGER

NIGER

ADVANCING A HUMANITARIAN DEVELOPMENT PEACE NEXUS APPROACH TO NUTRITION

In April 2023, the Haut-Commissariat à l’Initiative 3N (HC3N), which supports the Nigeriens Nourishing Nigeriens initiative (I3N), and the Platformes Nationale de l’Information pour la Nutrition (PNIN) requested support from N4D to advance a nutrition nexus approach in Niger. The Ministry of Public Health, Population and Social Affairs invited N4D to conduct a scoping visit in February 2025.

1.0

Overview

Niger has a long history of food and nutrition crises with 80 per cent of the population dependent on agriculture for their livelihoods. The country made progress in poverty reduction between 2014 and 2019: agriculture was the main driver for economic growth, with poverty dropping by 5.4 percentage points*. Despite such gains, poverty affects over 40 per cent of the population with higher levels of poverty in rural areas.

The country faces multiple vulnerabilities including insecurity, population growth, population displacement, poverty and climate risks. The population increased from 17 million in 2012 to 25.4 million in 2023. Sanctions imposed by the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) following the coup d’etat in July 2023 worsened levels of food insecurity, particularly in the regions most affected by the crisis – Diffa, Maradi, Tahoua and Tillabéri. The situation can only have been exacerbated by recent restrictions on USAID financing and France’s military withdrawal in 2023. Persistent violence and insecurity between 2019 and 2023 resulted in mass displacement: more than 308,200 migrants arrived, more than 1.2 million moved within the country and more than 2.2 million left. The Humanitarian Needs Overview (HNO) found that around 3.4 million people were food insecure during the 2024 lean season (June to August), with a lack of assistance for around 1.5 million people. Current Humanitarian Response Plan (HRP) funding is less than 19 per cent.

* Source: Niger Poverty Assessment, 2021

CHILDREN REQUIRE HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE

PEOPLE ARE INTERNALLY DISPLACED

PEOPLE NEED HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE

PEOPLE FACING FOOD & NUTRITION INSECURITY

%

CHILDREN AGED UNDER 5 YEARS ARE WASTED

%

CHILDREN AGED UNDER 5 YEARS SUFFER FROM MODERATE TO SEVERE STUNTING

Source: Niger Humanitarian Needs Overview 2024 (December 2023)

NOTE: Although stunting prevalence improved between 2006-2012 (from 54 per cent to 42 per cent), it increased to 47 per cent in 2022 with rates above 30 per cent in all regions except Niamey. Wasting prevalence nationally was recorded at 12.2 per cent  and 2.4 per cent SAM in the most recent SMART survey, which is above the WHO emergency threshold. Anaemia is estimated to affect over 70 per cent of under fives. Discussions are underway to update all these data, which are pre-2023, with a new SMART survey or MICS.  

KEY STAKEHOLDERS IN NIGER

Since the dissolution of HC3N in 2023, le Groupe Technique Nutrition (GTN) has become the main forum for nutrition stakeholders. GTN is led by the Director of Nutrition at the Ministry of Public Health, Population and Social Affairs. UNICEF acts as co-coordinator and an international NGO acts as co-facilitator. Meetings focus largely on nutritionspecific programming even though a sub-working group (GTN-S) exists and focusses upon nutritionsensitive programming. There is a strong civil society network in Niger known as Tous Unis pour Nutrition’ (TUN), a collaboration of 71 international and local NGOs working in eight regions of Niger. TUN has a coordination and advocacy function including integrating nutrition into communelevel budgets and resource generation for nutrition. 

1.1

Key characteristics of a NEXUS approach to nutrition

A HDPN approach to nutrition is guided by wider HDPN approaches such as the OECD DAC Recommendation on the Humanitarian-Development-Peace Nexus (see pdf download below).

N4D defines a HDPN approach for nutrition as: 

“… [when] all humanitarian, development and peace actors draw on their comparative advantages and work in collaboration and coherence with each other, under national leadership, in order to achieve the collective outcome of sustained improvements in nutrition for all people. All stakeholders align with national and sub-national priorities as outlined in one overarching, national and multisectoral nutrition action plan.” 

Key elements of a HDPN approach: 

  • Collective outcomes to sustainably reduce needs, risks and vulnerabilities by preventing, preparing and responding to malnutrition;
  • Collaborative and coherent ways of working between humanitarian, development and peace-building actors; 
  • Drawing on respective comparative advantages; and
  • Convergence of HDPN actions on the same at-risk populations.

Learn more

DAC Recommendation on the OECD Legal Instruments Humanitarian-Development-Peace Nexus (pdf)

Strengthening the Humanitarian-
Development Nexus for Nutrition in Protracted Crises (pdf)

Lessons learned and recommendations from
the humanitarian-development nexus for nutrition (pdf)

1.2

The Niger Context

Niger has long been a country of innovation in the field of nutrition and adopting a Nexus lens. The 2012 ‘Nigeriens Nourishing Nigeriens (I3N) programme (see box below) demonstrated an early commitment to multisectorality; and a roadmap in 2020 included the integrated management of acute malnutrition (IMAM) in the national budget to facilitate its transition from humanitarian assistance to development programmes. Despite the significant progress made in managing acute malnutrition, Niger’s high rates of child stunting and wasting have remained relatively stagnant in the last decade (see graph below). In 2021, 44.4 per cent of children aged under 5 years suffer from stunting, which is higher than the average for the Africa region (30.7 per cent) and among the highest in the world. The country has made some progress towards achieving the target for wasting but 11.5 per cent of children aged under 5 years are still affected and prevalence of severe acute malnutrition is 2.4 per cent (above the emergency threshold of 2 per cent). 

Effective nutrition policies and plans (see box below) are in place though crisis conditions are disrupting their implementation.

Key Nutrition Policies and Programmes in Niger

3N Initiative ‘Nigeriens Nourishing Nigeriens’ (I3N) focuses on sustainable agricultural practices, food and nutrition security and income generation, as well as social integration of the most vulnerable, including women. I3N sparked a new way of looking at nutrition as more than just a humanitarian issue or under food security.

The Politique Nationale de Sécurité Nutritionnelle (PNSN) 2017-2025 is the framework that sets out how malnutrition can be tackled through the alignment of nutrition specific and nutrition sensitive actions of the main line ministries, supported by the government’s humanitarian and development partners. The most recent action plan for the PNSN Policy runs from 2021-25. Up until the dissolution of HC3N, the PNSN Action Plan was closely monitored by PNIN and is widely believed to have had a high level of visibility and influence. 

The National Mechanism for the Prevention and Management of Disasters and Food Crises (DNPGCA) is attached to the Prime Minister’s office and provides the response to food and nutritional emergencies. The Ministry of Humanitarian Action and Disaster Management coordinates the nutritional response in camps and sites for displaced people.

Food and Nutrition Security and Sustainable Agricultural Development (SAN/DAD) strategy

The Integrated Management of Severe Acute Malnutrition (PCMIAS) programme (2020-2029) has an explicit goal of at least 50% of treatment programmes being covered by domestic resources by 2029.

The Resilience Programming for Safeguarding the Fatherland (PRSP) was developed in January 2024 and is focussed on building resilience to safeguard the population. It replaces the National Poverty Reduction Policy and Strategy (known as PDES). 

Prevelance of stunting, wasting and overweight in children under 5

Source: Global Nutriton Report

1.3

Humanitarian, development and peace financing in Niger

Since 2014, humanitarian needs have increased in the border regions due to the activities of non-state armed groups in Nigeria and Mali. Despite the increase in needs, humanitarian funding has not risen in step due to the global increase in humanitarian needs and strong competition for limited resources. Current funding for the Humanitarian Response Plan (HRP) is less than 19 per cent. However, until the change of government in 2023 and the withdrawal of some donors, Niger had been a significant recipient of development aid.

Source: States of Fragility

Estimates of domestic financing for nutrition showed an encouraging increase from 0.9 per cent to 3.1 per cent of GDP between 2018 and 2022. Before the change of government in 2023, there was a perception that humanitarian financing was declining faster than development assistance but the recent departures of some international donors and agencies means humanitarian financing is now the main form of international support. Anecdotal estimates are that humanitarian financing is currently 80-85 per cent of overall Official Development Assistance (ODA) to Niger.  

The international donors that remain in Niger support a wide array of health systems’ strengthening, resilience building and health, food security and nutrition security programmes. Many do not finance through government, instead allocating resources through international agencies and national non-government organisations. Some donors include Niger in Sahelian regional programmes, e.g., UK Aid, Swiss Development Cooperation (SDC), and a World Bank programme being developed to tackle malnutrition across the Sahel with a focus on prevention. Some donors consider themselves to be primarily development (and in some cases nexus) focussed, e.g., German Cooperation (GIZ), SDC and Spanish Cooperation. 

QUOTE FROM DONOR REPRESENTATIVE

‘It is important to think about a “reverse nexus” approach whereby development leads and when a crisis happens there are contingency funds to respond, but then we must quickly revert back to the development approach’.

2.0

Nexus approach in action

Since 2018, the government has been making efforts to implement the Humanitarian Development Peace (HDP) Nexus approach in order to: address the structural causes of vulnerabilities; deliver humanitarian assistance to save lives; and promote recovery, strengthening resilience and stability in fragile areas and communities. 

Seizing the momentum
Leaders and senior members of government have articulated the desire to markedly reduce the need for crisis response, especially in the current climate of scarce resources. The Resilience Programming for Safeguarding the Fatherland (PRSP) replaced the PDES (see box above) in 2024, and there is a growing national agenda for food sovereignty to increase food production and security across the population, thereby reducing food poverty and malnutrition.

DEVELOPING A NEXUS APPROACH IN NIGER

^
PRE 2016
  • 2011: ‘Haut-Commissariat à l’Initiative 3N’ (HC3N) created to ensure intersectoral coordination of SAN-DAD and facilitate achieving “Nigerians Feed Nigeriens” Initiative (I3N) objectives
  • 2012: Launch of I3N strategy for food security, nutrition and sustainable agricultural development by the then President of the Republic
  • 2012: I3N enabled development of multisectoral National Nutritional Security Policy (PNSN) 2012-2021, finally adopted in 2016
^
2016

WORLD HUMANITARIAN SUMMIT

  • World Humanitarian Summit, resulting in ‘The Grand Bargain’: a pledge between humanitarian actors and donor to improve effectiveness and efficiency of humanitarian actions through “Nexus Approach”
  • Recognition that nexus could address increasing complexity of crises in Niger and the Sahel
^
2017

A NEW WAY OF WORKING

  • The New Way of Working (a Nexus approach) calls on humanitarian and development actors to work towards ‘collective outcomes’ that reduce need, risk and vulnerability over multiple years.
^
2018

PUBLICATION OF HDP NEXUS FRAMEWORK

  •  The Government of Niger developed a framework for operationalizing the Nexus HDP
    • High-level Tripartite Committee (CTHN) formed in May 2018
    • Tripartite Technical Committee (CTTNUD) set up in October 2018
^
2019

ROADMAP FOR HDP NEXUS 

Adoption of a roadmap for operationalizing the Nexus HDP (CTTNUD action plan)

^
2020–2022

STUDY ON NEXUS IN ACTION

  • In-depth study on operationalization of Nexus approach in Tahoua and Tillabéri regions
^
2022–2023

FORMATION OF SUB-NATIONAL NEXUS GROUPS

  • Subnational nexus groups were formed to encourage nexus decentralization
^
2025-2027

NEW ACTION PLAN

  • CTTNUD has developed an action plan that includes workshops for directors of ministries on how to integrate a nexus approach into sector policies and plans

‘The new government has a vision for food sovereignty, which is a real opportunity for nutrition’ 

UN representative

Key principles for building a stronger nutrition nexus in Niger

These key principles broadly align with those set out in various CTTNUD documents and tools:

Building nutrition resilience through a combination of multisector nutrition specific and sensitive activities targeted to the at-risk populations in crisis vulnerable localities;

Coordination between humanitarian, development and peace actors to synergise efforts and ensure long-term nutrition resilience building;

Localise planning and responses to better identify local problems and solutions, enable earlier response to shocks(risk mitigation) and build sustainable locally governed services; and

Multi-year funding to enable predictable resources for planning and implementation.

Indicators can be developed for the above principles, which can be used to monitor progress towards building a stronger nexus for nutrition.

3.0

Next Steps

The next steps to advance a nutrition nexus approach in Niger are to reformulate the existing multisectoral nutrition policy and action plan (PNSN), preceded by an evaluation of the existing PNSN (which runs until November 2025). Once the policy and plan have been elaborated, next steps will include resource mobilisation and monitoring implementation of the policy and plan.

N4D support areas

Short-term activities

Short presentation of findings (see pdf below) from N4D scoping visit (February 2025) to key stakeholders (GTN members and other working groups, CTTNUD members, SUN Networks, etc) to ensure all stakeholders have an opportunity to discuss the proposed ways forward and raise questions

Co-create a detailed workplan with Niger colleagues (MoH/DN, MoHA/GC and PNIN) to provide a framework for regular meetings, discussion of progress and course change where needed

Medium-to long-term activities

Evaluation of PNSN is clearly a major priority in Niger and will require clear Terms of Reference (ToR) to guide the process. N4D can support all elements of this process as requested by colleagues in MoH/DN, MoHA/GC and PNIN/INS.

PNSN updates will be a significant undertaking also requiring a clear process, regular engagement of working group members and orientation on the need for the policy and plan to be nexus sensitive. N4D can help define nutrition nexus-centric indicators for monitoring adherence to a nexus approach within PNSN and support the process.

Resource mobilisation includes resources for the convening body authorised to oversee the evaluation and iteration of the new PNSN Policy and Action Plan; and generating domestic and international resources for implementing the PNSN Action Plan. Both Ethiopia and Yemen colleagues have substantial experience of developing resource mobilisation plans and advocacy, which can be transferred to benefit Niger.

Learning between Ethiopia, Yemen and Niger on advancing multi-sector nutrition action plans through a nexus approach can be of great value through peer exchange and unpacking examples of good practice to inform policies, plans and approaches. N4D is considering a learning exchange in the region in late 2025.

This page will continue to be updated with content and other supporting documents as the project progresses. We welcome any feedback and are always keen to engage in discussion.

All main images © Unicef. Other images N4D.